D.C. Parents, Help Us Protect Children From Being Vaccinated Without Parental Consent

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and Parental Rights Foundation (PRF) on July 12 filed a joint lawsuit challenging the D.C. Minor Consent for Vaccinations Amendment Act of 2020 as unconstitutional. We are looking for additional plaintiffs to add to the case. DC Parents Help Us Protect Children From Being Vaccinated Without Parental Consent

The recently enacted law allows children 11 and older to receive vaccinations at school without the knowledge or consent of a parent.

Under the new law, even if the parent previously submitted a written religious exemption statement, school officials may secretly administer vaccines to the child against the parents’ written directive.

In other words, to sue, the plaintiff must be injured or the injury must be “imminent.”

In the D.C. lawsuit, the parents and children are in a legal catch-22. The children cannot be physically injured until the vaccine is injected — but the parents cannot successfully sue to stop the injection because the child has not yet been injured.

The one exception is if the plaintiffs can show that the injury is “imminent.” The standard of proof for risk of “imminent” injury is very high and very fact-specific.

The D. C. lawsuit was “dismissed without prejudice,” which means the lawsuit will be re-filed by Oct. 1, and additional facts and plaintiffs may be added in order to get over the “legal standing” hurdle.    DC Parents Help Us Protect Children From Being Vaccinated Without Parental Consent

We need additional plaintiffs to add to the case. There are two things we need to show for standing:

• The child is being pressured to get the vaccine — either by school and/or by peer pressure.
• The child is verbalizing that he/she is going to defy the parents and get the shot.

The perfect plaintiff would be the parents of a child who got the first shot and is threatening to go get the second.

If you wish to be considered as an additional plaintiff, please contact CHD immediately. Time of the essence. The new complaint will be filed on or before Oct. 1.

To be a plaintiff in the case challenging the new law, the parent and child must meet the following requirements:

• The parent and child must be residents of the District of Columbia.
• The child must be between the ages of 11 and 18.
• The child must be eligible for enrollment in school in the District of Columbia.
• The child’s school may be public or private.

If you and your child meet these requirements and you wish to stand up for your constitutional rights and liberty, fill out the form. You can also help by forwarding this email to any parents that you know in the Washington, D.C. area. Thank you!

Experts Tell FDA Vaccines ‘Harm More People Than They Save,’ But NIH Director Believes Boosters Will Be Approved in Coming Weeks

 The FDA advisory panel to recommend whether to approve a third dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, physicians pointed to data they said confirm the risks of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine don’t outweigh the benefits.

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Dr. Francis Collins said he would be “surprised” if COVID booster shots were not recommended for other Americans in the upcoming weeks even after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) advisory committee on Sept. 17 overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to distribute booster shots of Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID vaccine to the general public.

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) recommended the agency approve Pfizer’s application for boosters only for people 65 and older and certain high-risk populations.